Madonna and Child
Thursday, October 19th, 2006It’s strange to feel so strongly about people who have absolutely no bearing on my life. I’ve never owned one of her albums, though Borderline is on my iPod. Even so, I feel surprisingly conflicted about Madonna’s decision to ‘adopt’ a one-year-old boy from Malawi.
She chose to adopt the boy, David, during a nine-day humanitarian visit to draw attention to the southern African country’s thousands of orphans, and AIDS epidemic. Malawian law, however, prohibits non-residents from adopting its children. Madonna was made an exception.
Is this a publicity stunt? Mother- and fatherhood seem to be a growing trend among the glitterati. I’ve tagged Google for stories on ‘fatherhood’, and rarely does a week pass without Brad Pitt or Jack Black or Ben Affleck talking about how fatherhood has changed my life. And how you can really see that in my new movie. Star Magazine reported that Tobey Maquire is asking Ben Affleck for fatherhood advice. Is Madonna simply trying to make her mark in celebrity parenting?
Or did she simply fall in love? Bureaucracy sucks the life from adoptions. Given the choice, I’m not sure I can fault Madonna for taking advantage of her influence.
In the end, the key to adoption is finding what’s best for the child. Is it better for David to live in poverty, in his own country, or to be raised in obscene wealth by a nanny? One of the reasons my wife and I left California was the tendency to treat children as accessories. That trend hasn’t gone away.
Tread carefully, Madonna. Despite your intentions, David is nothing more and nothing less than a child. I have friends who are working through the adoption process. It takes months, and thousands of dollars. Though frustrating, there is a purpose for that red tape. There’s a reason it takes nine months for a child to be born, and it’s not all to do with biology.
Parenting should never be done in haste.
